Capturing some mostly minor errors in this training.

1) Hey, the first slide has an Oxford comma, I like it!

2) The text on the first slide uses words like "direct reports" and "manager" that mostly won't apply to anyone that does not work at Schoolhouse. For those on volunteer teams, these also aren't really the appropriate words. I didn't have trouble mapping these words to what they'd likely mean for those on volunteer teams, but found it odd that these terms were used in a training open to all volunteers at SHW.

3) The second attachment says 7+ minutes. I'd suggest aligning the numbers (15 seemed reasonable to me).

4) In the next attachment, the order has now become "up, sideways, down," although the training title and intro slide used "up, down, and sideways" as the sequence. I think "up, down, and sideways" reads the nicest, while "up, sideways, and down" flows the best from a training perspective. I think it's fine to keep this inconsistency if intentional, just wanted to note it.

5) In the next attachment, I'll just note that the & character is used extensively in this training. I'm not sure if I've noticed it used in any other training I've taken in the last few weeks (when I've taken well over a dozen). It's fine, just inconsistent with what I've seen elsewhere. Also a lot more "and/or" in this training than others.

6) In the next attachment, "aren't sure of what" can be simplified to "aren't sure what"

7) In the next attachment, consider "within your team" as an alternative to "amongst your team." I think that would read slightly more naturally.

8) In the next attachment, the 3rd bullet is unclear to me. There wasn't content that covered this concern. I am particularly unclear what "& delegating" means here (I know the word, I am just unclear what it is trying to convey).

9) In the next attachment, missing "an" before "authoritarian."

10) In the next attachment, item 3 should be "Build stronger professional relationships." as the "helps you" is already present leading into the bulleted choices.

11) In the next attachment, "use those to as a way" has an extraneous "to". Also, the reference to James could be clearer (email, perhaps). Especially after Slack goes away, it won't be obvious to people how to contact James (no user search in the current UI that I'm aware of, no way to search past messages).